UNDERSTANDING THE BENEFITS AND LIMITATIONS OF COASTAL NBS
ICCE 2022
PDF

How to Cite

UNDERSTANDING THE BENEFITS AND LIMITATIONS OF COASTAL NBS. (2023). Coastal Engineering Proceedings, 37, papers.69. https://doi.org/10.9753/icce.v37.papers.69

Abstract

As Coastal NBS are implemented more widely it is important to be clear in our definition of NBS and understand the benefits and limitations of the various approaches. Coastal NBS involve using natural features to offer, or improve, coastal protection while producing additional economic, environmental and social benefits. There are, however, a broad range of solutions spanning the creation of large expanses of habitats, hybrids of habitats and harder engineered structures and ecological enhancements of existing infrastructure. Costs and performance therefore vary widely and not all NBS are low cost or self-maintaining. In many instances the capacity for sedimentary habitats to self-maintain will depend on sediment availability and this emphasizes the need to consider whole life costs when comparing NBS with more traditional harder defences. The incorporation of habitat components can however bring multiple benefits for both nature and people. Implemented correctly, Coastal NBS therefore have the potential to be ‘no regret’ solutions in many locations.
PDF

References

Ecoshape, 2023: https://www.vanoord.com/en/sustainability/cases/hondsbossche-and-pettemer-seadefence/

Accessed: 20.2.23.

Estuary edges, 2019. CASE STUDIES Greenwich Peninsula Terraces North East

https://www.estuaryedges.co.uk/case-studies/greenwich-peninsula-terraces-north-east/

Accessed 23.2.23.

Guerry, A.D., Silver, J., Beagle, J. et al. Protection and restoration of coastal habitats yield multiple

benefits for urban residents as sea levels rise. npj Urban Sustain 2, 13 (2022).

https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-022-00056-y

Lopez, John A. “The Multiple Lines of Defense Strategy to Sustain Coastal Louisiana.” Journal of

Coastal Research, 2009, 186–97. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25737479.

Manson, S. (2017). Case study 54. Case study 54. Alkborough Flats Managed Realignment. Case study

created as part of the ‘Working with natural processes to reduce flood risk’ project led by the

Environment Agency.

https://www.therrc.co.uk/sites/default/files/projects/54_alkborough.pdf

Accessed 23.2.23.

National Fish and Wildlife Foundation and US department of the Interior, 2019. Case study: Restoring

beaches and dunes through the hurricane Sandy Coastal Resilience Program.

https://www.nfwf.org/sites/default/files/hurricanesandy/Documents/hurricane-sandy-beach-dunerestoration-

case-study.pdf

Accessed 23.2.23.

Naylor, LA., Kippen, H, Coombes, MA., et al. 2017. Appendix 4. Coastal. Case Study CS-C3:

Intertidal vegetated terraces.

http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/150672/42/150672Appendix4.pdf

In Greening the Grey: A Framework for Integrated Green Grey Infrastructure (IGGI)

Accessed 23.2.23.

Pontee, N., Hosking, A, Bassetti, L., Bird, J. (2023). Nature based resilience solutions for Tyndall air

force base, Florida. Marine Structures and Breakwaters 2023, Portsmouth, 25-27 April 2023,

Portsmouth.

Reeve, D., Chadwick, A. and Fleming, C., 2018. Coastal engineering: processes, theory and design

practice. Crc Press.

Salgado K and Martinez ML (2017) Is ecosystem-based coastal defense a realistic alternative?

Exploring the evidence. Journal of Coastal Conservation 21(6): 837–848.

The Nature Conservancy (2023). Living shorelines: Arlington Cove. Project datasheet.

Available at:

https://www.nature.org/content/dam/tnc/nature/en/documents/Arlington-Cove-living-shorelines.pdf

Accessed 23.2.23.

USACE, 2023. Multiple Lines of Defense

https://www.erdc.usace.army.mil/Media/Images/igphoto/2002513073/

Accessed 23.2.23.

Van Ord, 2023. Website: https://www.ecoshape.org/en/cases/sand-nourishment-hondsbossche-dunesnl/

construction/

Accessed: 20.2.23.

van Zanten, B., K. Arkema, T. Swannack, R. Griffin, S. Narayan, K. Penn, B. G. Reguero,

G. Samonte, S. Scyphers, E. Codner-Smith, S. IJff, M. Kress, and M. Lemay. 2021.

“Chapter 6: Benefits and Costs of NNBF.” In International Guidelines on Natural and

Nature-Based Features for Flood Risk Management. Edited by T. S. Bridges, J. K. King,

J. D. Simm, M. W. Beck, G. Collins, Q. Lodder, and R. K. Mohan. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army

Engineer Research and Development Center.

Accessed 24.2.23.

Walters, Gretchen Marie. 2016. Nature-Based Solutions to Address Global Societal Challenges.

Nature-Based Solutions to Address Global Societal Challenges.

https://doi.org/10.2305/iucn.ch.2016.13.en.

Accessed: 23.2.23.

Wheeler, D., Tan, S., Pontee, N., Pygott, J. 2008. Alkborough scheme reduces extreme water levels in the Humber Estuary and creates new habitat. FLOODrisk 2008 - The European conference on flood risk management research in to practice 30 September - 2 October 2008 Keble College, Oxford, UK. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260087257_Alkborough_scheme_reduces_extreme_water_levels_in_the_Humber_Estuary_and_creates_new_habitat

Accessed 23.2.23.

Williams AT, Giardino A and Pranzini E (2016) Canons of coastal engineering in the United Kingdom:

seawalls/groynes, a century of change? Journal of Coastal Research 32(5): 1196–1211.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Nigel I Pontee