SCALES & SIGNATURES OF EPISODIC SAND BYPASSING AT A TIDE-DOMINATED INLET - FRIPP INLET, SOUTH CAROLINA
ICCE 2014 Cover Image
PDF

Keywords

tidal inlet
bypassing
beach erosion
ebb-tidal delta
seawall

How to Cite

Kana, T. W., Traynum, S. B., & Kaczkowski, H. L. (2014). SCALES & SIGNATURES OF EPISODIC SAND BYPASSING AT A TIDE-DOMINATED INLET - FRIPP INLET, SOUTH CAROLINA. Coastal Engineering Proceedings, 1(34), sediment.52. https://doi.org/10.9753/icce.v34.sediment.52

Abstract

This paper provides a case example of meso-scale sand circulation and volumes in a tide-dominated inlet (Fripp Inlet, South Carolina, USA) and the adjacent barrier island. Episodic bypassing is the dominant process controlling shoreline change in this area (Gaudiano & Kana 2001). The scale of bypassing in this case has proven to be more than adequate to restore a highly eroding armored beach along Fripp Island. Upward of 2.7 million cubic meters (m³) shifted from the ebb-tidal delta of Fripp Inlet to a central oceanfront area of Fripp Island between 1989 and 2012. This volume, representing roughly 10 percent of the ebb-tidal delta volume, provided natural nourishment equivalent to nearly 600 cubic meters per meter of shoreline (m³/m) along the nearly 5-kilometer (km) long barrier island. The volume density varied greatly with some beach segments widening by more than 500 m. Prior to the bypassing events, there was no beach at high tide along most of the island. The paper discusses the possible trigger for recent bypassing events and documents changes in Fripp Inlet. Channel rotation into a seawall, southerly deflection of the ebb-delta centroid, and large inputs of sand from the adjacent barrier island appear to have produced conditions promoting large releases of sand to Fripp Island. While the influx of sand has restored much of the oceanfront, full restoration of a sandy beach along the inlet margin will require a channel avulsion or realignment such that the principal erosion-causing process-ebb jet in the main channel-no longer encroaches on the seawall. A channel realignment plan developed by the authors will require upward of 1.2 million m³ of dredging under present conditions but possibly less volume in the near future because of the formation of an incipient new channel.
https://doi.org/10.9753/icce.v34.sediment.52
PDF

References

Anders, FJ, DW Reed, and EP Meisburger. 1990. Shoreline movements: report 2: Tybee Island, Georgia, to Cape Fear, North Carolina, 1851-1983. Tech Rept CERC-83-1, CERC-Waterways Experiment Station, USACE, Vicksburg, MS, 152 pp + app.

Bruun, P, and F Gerritsen. 1959. Natural bypassing of sand at coastal inlets. Jour. Waterways and Harbor Div, ASCE, New York, NY, Vol. 85(WW4), pp 75-107.

CSE. 2011. Beach restoration and groin construction (2006-2007), Hunting Island State Park, Beaufort County, South Carolina. Year 4 Monitoring Report for State Project P28-9665-MJ, SC Department of Parks Recreation & Tourism, Columbia, SC. Coastal Science & Engineering, Columbia, SC, 86 pp + appendices.

CSE. 2013 (April). Assessment of potential realignment of Fripp Inlet and alternatives for oceanfront improvement, Fripp Island, South Carolina - Tasks 2 & 3. Technical Report for Fripp Island Public Service District and Fripp Island Property Owners Association. CSE, Columbia, SC, 57 pp.

FitzGerald, DM. 1984. Interactions between the ebb-tidal delta and landward shoreline: Price Inlet, South Carolina. Jour. Sed. Petrology, Vol. 54(4), pp 1303-1318.

FitzGerald, DM, D Nummedal, and TW Kana. 1976. Sand circulation patterns of Price Inlet, South Carolina. In Proc 15th Coastal Engineering Conf, ASCE, New York, pp 1868-1880.

Gaudiano, DJ, and TW Kana. 2001. Shoal bypassing in South Carolina tidal inlets: geomorphic variables and empirical predictions for nine mesotidal inlets. Jour Coastal Research, Vol 17, pp 280-291.

Hayes, MO. 1994. Georgia Bight. Chapter 7 in RA Davis, Jr (ed), Geology of the Holocene Barrier Island System, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 233-304.

Hubbard, DK, JH Barwis, and D Nummedal. 1977. Sediment transport in four South Carolina inlets. In Proc Coastal Sediments '77, pp 582-601.

Kana, TW, and R.K. Mohan. 1998. Analysis of nourished profile stability following the fifth Hunting Island (SC) beach nourishment project. Jour. Coastal Engineering, Vol. 33, pp 117-136.

Kana, TW, EJ Hayter, and PA Work. 1999. Mesoscale sediment transport at southeastern U.S. tidal inlets: conceptual model applicable to mixed energy settings. Jour. Coastal Research, Vol 15(2), pp 303-313.

Kana, TW, SB Traynum, D Gaudiano, HL Kaczkowski, and T Hair. 2013. The physical condition of South Carolina beaches 1980-2010. Jour Coastal Research, Special Issue 69, pp 61-82.

USACE. 2004. Environmental assessment (EA), Hunting Island ecosystem restoration study, Beaufort County, South Carolina. USACE, Charleston District, South Carolina, 29 pp + appendices A-J.

Walton, TL, and WD Adams. 1976. Capacity of inlet outer bars to store sand. 15th Coastal Engineering Conf, ASCE, New York, NY, Vol. 2, pp 1919-1937.

Zarillo, GA, WE Jones, and CM McCreesh. 1981. Beach erosion and shoreline processes: Hunting Island, South Carolina. Dept. Geol, Univ. South Carolina, Columbia, 88 pp.

Authors retain copyright and grant the Proceedings right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this Proceedings.