SPOT APPLICATION TOOL FOR WAVE DRIVEN NEARSHORE HYDRODYNAMICS
ICCE 2016 Cover Image
DOC

Keywords

wave-current interaction
Tidal Inlet
Boussinesq model
Delft3D
SWAN

How to Cite

SPOT APPLICATION TOOL FOR WAVE DRIVEN NEARSHORE HYDRODYNAMICS. (2017). Coastal Engineering Proceedings, 1(35), waves.19. https://doi.org/10.9753/icce.v35.waves.19

Abstract

Nearshore hydrodynamics are driven by a wide spectrum of motions/scales that vary on the order of O (10) m to O (100) km. These scales have different effects on the dynamics of the nearshore areas, and capturing these effects is essential in accurately modeling the nearshore processes such as: mixing and transport of pollutants, wave steeping and/or wave damping, erosion and deposition of sediments, and infragravity wave propagation. For example, in tidal inlets, waves interact with tidal-currents and bathymetry. The presences of waves alter the kinematics and the dynamics of the tidal-currents such as increasing the bottom friction due to wave bottom boundary layer and changing the vertical profile of the horizontal velocity from the well-known log profile. The tidal-currents affect the wave kinematics and dynamics such as Doppler shift, wave refraction, and wave steeping in opposite currents, wave breaking and infragravity wave propagation. The time and length scales of the current are much larger than those of the waves, and modeling this interaction using a single numerical model is numerically expensive. One approach to overcome this issue is through using multi-scale numerical modeling by coupling two or more numerical models. In literature, spectral wave models have been widely coupled with circulation models to study wave-current interaction. These spectral models can provide accurate predictions for wave height but they don't provide accurate information about nonlinear wave statistics, i.e. wave skewness and asymmetry, which is a key parameter in sediment transport models. On the other hand, the phase-resolving models are capable of providing this information. In the current study, the large-scale circulation model, Delft3D, is coupled with time-domain Boussinesq-type wave model. The use of time domain wave model in the numerical coupling will improve the prediction of various nearshore processes such as: wave breaking and thus infragravity wave release and propagation, combined vertical velocity structure under external forcings of tidal currents. Such an application will fulfill the community needs for a "spot application tool" where we simulate wave-driven processes in a large domain with fine-resolution.
DOC

References

Battjes, J.A., and J.P.F.M. Janssen. 1978. Energy loss and set-up due to breaking of random waves, Proceedings of 14th International Conference on Coastal Engineering, ASCE, 466-480.

De Vriend, H.J., J. Zyserman, J. Nicholson, J.A. Roelvink, P. Pechon, and H.N. Southgate. 1993. Medium-term 2DH coastal area modeling, Coastal Engineering, 21, 193-224.

Wargula, A., Raubenheimer, B., and Elgar, S. 2014. Wave-driven along-channel subtidal flows in a well-mixed ocean inlet. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 119:2987-3001. doi: 10.1002/2014JC009839.

Bakker, W., and van Doorn, T. 2011. Near-bottom velocities in waves with a current. Coastal Engineering Proceedings, 1(16).

Morelissen, R., Der Kaaij, T., and Bleninger, T. (2013). Dynamic coupling of near field and far field models for simulating effluent discharges. Water Science and Technology, 67(10):2210 - 2220.

Veeramony, J., Condon, A., and Hebert, D. (2012). Effect of coupling wave and flow dynamics on hurricane surge and inundation. Proceedings of the International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, pages 1503 - 1507, Rhodes, Greece.

Nardin, W., and Fagherazzi, S. (2012). The effect of wind waves on the development of river mouth bars. Geophysical Research Letters, 39(12).

Elias, E. P. L., Gelfenbaum, G., and Van der Westhuysen, A. J. (2012). Validation of a coupled wave-flow model in a high-energy setting: The mouth of the Columbia river. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 117(C9):n/a-n/a. doi: 10.1029/2012JC008105. C09011.

Chen, B., Zhu, J., and Li, L. (2012). Accelerating 3d ocean model development by using gpu computing. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, pages 37 - 43, Takamatsu, Japan.

Chen, J.-L., Hsu, T.-J., Shi, F., Raubenheimer, B., and Elgar, S. (2015). Hydrodynamic and sediment transport modeling of new river inlet (nc) under the interaction of tides and waves. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 120(6):4028 - 47.

Condon, A., and Veeramony, J. (2012//). Development and validation of a coastal surge and inundation prediction system. pages 8 pp. -, Piscataway, NJ, USA.

Soulsby, R., Hamm, L., Klopman, G., Myrhaug, D., Simons, R., and Thomas, G. (1993).Wave-current interaction within and outside the bottom boundary layer. Coastal Engineering, 21(1-3):41 - 69.

Swan, C. (1990). An experimental study of waves on a strongly sheared current profile. volume 1, pages 489 - 502, Delft, Neth.

Authors retain copyright and grant the Proceedings right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this Proceedings.