• Edward Couriel
  • Lex Nielsen
  • Indra Jayewardene
  • Bronson McPherson


Coastal process understanding is based on observations of physical processes in the field and laboratory from which theories are developed. Theories may be expressed mathematically and coded into numerical models. Compared with the cost of field data acquisition and laboratory experiments, the cost of numerical modelling is often perceived to be low. Therefore, there is a tendency to undertake coastal investigation and design using numerical modelling methods alone. However, there is still a need for physical modelling in coastal engineering.


Hudson, R.Y. (1953). Wave Forces on Breakwaters, Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, ASCE, Vol. 118, 1953, pp653-674.

Hughes, S.A. (2014). Coastal engineering challenges in a changing world, Journal of Applied Water Engineering and Research, 2014, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp72-80.

Kamphuis, J.W. (1985). On understanding scale effect in coastal mobile bed models, in Dalrymple, R.A. (Ed.) Physical Modelling in Coastal Engineering, Balkema, 141-162.

Kamphuis, J.W. (2016). Coastal modeling - a retrospective, Proc. 6th International Conference on the Application of Physical Modelling in Coastal and Port Engineering and Science (Coastlab16), Ottawa, Canada, May 10-13, 2016.

O'Brien, M.P. (1931). Estuary tidal prism related to entrance areas, Civil Engineering, Vol. 1, No. 8, p 738.

Toombes, L., Chanson (2011). Numerical limitations of hydraulic models. 34th IAHR World Congress, Brisbane, pp2322-2329.

How to Cite
Couriel, E., Nielsen, L., Jayewardene, I., & McPherson, B. (2018). THE NEED FOR PHYSICAL MODELS IN COASTAL ENGINEERING. Coastal Engineering Proceedings, 1(36), structures.52.